From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 22 09:26:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CDD16A515 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:26:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhay@meraka.csir.co.za) Received: from zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za (zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za [146.64.24.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303C513C43E for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:26:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhay@meraka.csir.co.za) Received: by zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za (Postfix, from userid 3973) id 23CF633CAE; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:26:10 +0200 (SAST) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:26:10 +0200 From: John Hay To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070322092609.GA58744@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: current to 6-stable merge plans/policy X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:26:12 -0000 Hi Guys, What are the ideas (policy) about merging the arm/ixp425/avila stuff to 6-stable? I see some arm stuff gets merged, but it does not look like everything? Is it just that people merge what they need? Just trying to get a feel for it. Up to now I have used 6-stable on our soekris and wrap boards, but we are probably going to use the Avila boards a bit more, so I was wondering if I should use -current or 6-stable on them. Up to now my Avila and ADI testing was done with -current, but I'm not sure if that is a good idea for boxes that will end up in rural areas far far away. Hmm. Not that I have seen a panic on the Avila boards, but they have gone through a lot less testing up to now. John -- John Hay -- John.Hay@meraka.csir.co.za / jhay@FreeBSD.org