From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jan 12 19:04:08 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id TAA24066 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 12 Jan 1995 19:04:08 -0800
Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id TAA24058 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 1995 19:04:00 -0800
Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA07920
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Thu, 12 Jan 1995 20:43:05 -0600
Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA17974; 12 Jan 95 20:42:29 CST (Thu)
Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id UAA17971; Thu, 12 Jan 1995 20:42:29 -0600
From: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com>
Message-Id: <199501130242.UAA17971@bonkers.taronga.com>
Subject: Re: Small syscons change
To: ache@astral.msk.su (Andrew A. Chernov, Black Mage)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 1995 20:42:28 -0600 (CST)
Cc: wpaul@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <FTKNR5lqb2@astral.msk.su> from "Andrew A. Chernov, Black Mage" at Jan 13, 95 02:05:56 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 178       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> VT100 have very different behaviour then simple line wrap:

No kidding. My point is that all the VAX (VMS, I assume) software he
was complaining about was likely expecting it.