From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 00:14:01 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4E3106566B; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 00:14:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ray@ddteam.net) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35F38FC0C; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 00:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by faar19 with SMTP id r19so8066559faa.13 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:13:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.5.201 with SMTP id 9mr51438070faw.5.1320709577407; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:46:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from rnote.ddteam.net (96-125-133-95.pool.ukrtel.net. [95.133.125.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f4sm24943493faj.1.2011.11.07.15.46.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:46:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 01:46:11 +0200 From: Aleksandr Rybalko To: Benjamin Kaduk Message-Id: <20111108014611.89665cbc.ray@ddteam.net> In-Reply-To: References: <201111051459.pA5Ex8tg054029@repoman.freebsd.org> <20111107120232.07be56e4.ray@dlink.ua> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.0 (GTK+ 2.24.5; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-doc@freebsd.org, Aleksandr Rybalko , ray@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Daniel Gerzo , doc-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/news/status report-2011-07-2011-09.xml X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:14:01 -0000 On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 18:17:23 -0500 (EST) Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote: > > > On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 23:41:35 -0500 (EST) > > Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > > >>> @@ -1209,10 +1209,11 @@ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -

Many embedded devices have Ethernet switch on board, > >>> same take a > >>> - place on some multiports NICs, switch framework designed > >>> to give > >>> - ability to user easily control basic futures that > >>> management > >>> - switches have, such a VLANs, QOS, port mirroring, etc. > >>> Currently we > >>> +

Many embedded devices have an Ethernet switch on board; > >>> + in some ways this is similar to some multiport NICs. > >>> + A switch framework is designed to give users the ability > >>> to easily > >>> + control basic features present in managed switches, such > >>> as > >>> + VLANs, QoS, port mirroring, etc. Currently we are > >>> able to control only VLANs on:

> > > > Here is not exact what I mean, > > By phrase "same take a place on some multiports NICs" I mean some > > multiport NIC's have attached Ethernet switch to it, so single PCI > > NIC chip communicate with one port of this switch, but other switch > > ports connected to external RJ45 connectors. > > > > Ah, I see -- thank you for correcting me. > > > So maybe better to say: "Some multiport NICs also have embedded > > Ethernet switch"? > > With that change, this paragraph would become: >

Many embedded devices have an Ethernet switch on board; > such switches are even embedded on some multiport NICs. > This embedded switch framework is designed to give users the ability > to easily control basic features present in managed switches, such as > VLANs, QoS, port mirroring, etc. Currently we are > able to control only VLANs on:

> > Thanks! > > -Ben Yeah, that fine. Thank you so much! WBW -- Aleksandr Rybalko