Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 13:26:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Marco Beishuizen <mbeis@xs4all.nl> To: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/alpine new Makefile Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.21.1706091319490.27805@yokozuna> In-Reply-To: <7b39bcd3-ee60-4ef9-ff4b-fdb35b3fad73@FreeBSD.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.21.1706091129350.2993@yokozuna> <7b39bcd3-ee60-4ef9-ff4b-fdb35b3fad73@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 9 Jun 2017, the wise Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 6/9/17 7:41 PM, Marco Beishuizen wrote: > > Hi Marco, > > I believe the reason is: > >> .include <bsd.port.options.mk> > > The port includes this ^^^^ ... AND > > <snip> > >> .include <bsd.port.pre.mk> > > This ---------^^^^^ > > Use one or the other, or neither if its *all* options helpers, but not > both. See: > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html > > The paragraph just above the "Example 5.28. Simple Use of OPTIONS" Thanks Kubilay. I've removed the ".include <bsd.port.pre.mk" line and changed the ".include <bsd.port.post.mk>" line at the end to ".include <bsd.port.mk>". It still builds and installs but the options that are set are still not built in. Also the file /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.options.mk suggests that all three lines should be present. Regards, Marco -- Finagle's Creed: Science is true. Don't be misled by facts.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.21.1706091319490.27805>