Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:32:15 -0700 From: YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com> To: Jan Winter <jan.winter@kantarmedia.de> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bce: Device not configured Message-ID: <20120316173215.GB6841@michelle.cdnetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <4F61FA9A.5000805@kantarmedia.de> References: <4F5F46DE.5050608@kantarmedia.de> <20120314184047.GA8023@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <4F60AC6C.2060805@kantarmedia.de> <20120315172928.GB3295@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <4F61FA9A.5000805@kantarmedia.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 03:20:10PM +0100, Jan Winter wrote: > On 03/15/12 18:29, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 03:34:20PM +0100, Jan Winter wrote: > >>On 03/14/12 19:40, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > >>>On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 02:08:46PM +0100, Jan Winter wrote: > >>>>Hello, > >>>> > >>>>on an Dell Blade m610 is not possible to change the network media > >>>>option: > >>>> > >>>>ifconfig bce0 media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex up > >>>>ifconfig: SIOCSIFMEDIA (media): Device not configured > >>>> > >>>>Setting the media option to "autoselect" and connecting the m610 to a > >>>>100 MBit switch, I always get "no carrier" > >>>>only 1g full-duplex seems to be working. I have tested this on > >>>>8.3-prerelease and 9-stable > >>>> > >>>>any Ideas? > >>>> > >>>>cheers > >>>>Jan > >>>> > >>>>pciconf -lv > >>>>bce0@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x02871028 chip=0x163a14e4 > >>>>rev=0x20 hdr=0x00 > >>>> vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' > >>>> device = 'NetXtreme II BCM5709S Gigabit Ethernet' > >>>> class = network > >>>> subclass = ethernet > >>>> > >>>>dmesg > >>>>bce0:<Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5709 1000Base-SX (C0)> mem > >>>>0xda000000-0xdbffffff irq 36 at device 0.0 on pci1 > >>>>miibus0:<MII bus> on bce0 > >>>>brgphy0:<BCM5709S 1000/2500baseSX PHY> PHY 2 on miibus0 > >>>>brgphy0: 1000baseSX-FDX, auto > >>>>bce0: Ethernet address: 00:26:b9:fb:04:0c > >>>>bce0: ASIC (0x57092000); Rev (C0); Bus (PCIe x4, 2.5Gbps); B/C (5.0.11); > >>>>Bufs (RX:2;TX:2;PG:8); Flags (SPLT|MSI|MFW); MFW (NCSI 2.0.5) > >>>>Coal (RX:6,6,18,18; TX:20,20,80,80) > >>>>bce1:<Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5709 1000Base-SX (C0)> mem > >>>>0xdc000000-0xddffffff irq 48 at device 0.1 on pci1 > >>>>miibus1:<MII bus> on bce1 > >>>>brgphy1:<BCM5709S 1000/2500baseSX PHY> PHY 2 on miibus1 > >>>>brgphy1: 1000baseSX-FDX, auto > >>>>bce1: Ethernet address: 00:26:b9:fb:04:0e > >>>>bce1: ASIC (0x57092000); Rev (C0); Bus (PCIe x4, 2.5Gbps); B/C (5.0.11); > >>>>Bufs (RX:2;TX:2;PG:8); Flags (SPLT|MSI|MFW); MFW (NCSI 2.0.5) > >>>>Coal (RX:6,6,18,18; TX:20,20,80,80) > >>>> > >>>I'm not sure you're seeing one of long standing remote PHY issue of > >>>blade box but would you try the patch at the following URL? > >>>http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/bce/bce.rphy.diff > >>> > >>>After applying the patch, show me the dmesg output(bce(4) and > >>>brgphy(4) related ones) and 'ifconfig -m bce0'. > >>>Note, the patch was not tested at all(lack of hardware). > >>Hello, > >> > >>thank you very much, for your quick support > >>Now its looking much better > >> > >>ifconfig -m bce0 > >>bce0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu > >>1500 > >> > >>options=c01bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,VLAN_HWTSO,LINKSTATE> > >> > >>capabilities=c01bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,VLAN_HWTSO,LINKSTATE> > >> ether 00:26:b9:fb:04:0c > >> inet 192.168.100.30 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.100.255 > >> inet6 fe80::226:b9ff:fefb:40c%bce0 prefixlen 64 tentative > >>scopeid 0x1 > >> nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> > >> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT<full-duplex>) > >> status: active > >> supported media: > >> media autoselect > >> media 1000baseT mediaopt full-duplex > >> media 1000baseT > >> media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex > >> media 100baseTX > >> media 10baseT/UTP mediaopt full-duplex > >> media 10baseT/UTP > >> > >>dmesg: > >>..... > >>bce0:<Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5709 1000Base-SX (C0)> mem > >>0xda000000-0xdbffffff irq 36 at device 0.0 on pci1 > >>bce0: attempting to allocate 1 MSI vectors (16 supported) > >>msi: routing MSI IRQ 256 to local APIC 16 vector 52 > >>bce0: using IRQ 256 for MSI > >>bce0: Remote PHY : TP > >>bce0: bpf attached > >>bce0: Ethernet address: 00:26:b9:fb:04:0c > >>bce0: ASIC (0x57092000); Rev (C0); Bus (PCIe x4, 2.5Gbps); B/C (5.0.11); > >>Bufs (RX:2;TX:2;PG:8); Flags (SPLT|MSI|Remote PHY(TP)|MFW); MFW (NCSI > >>2.0.5) > >>Coal (RX:6,6,18,18; TX:20,20,80,80) > >>bce1:<Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5709 1000Base-SX (C0)> mem > >>0xdc000000-0xddffffff irq 48 at device 0.1 on pci1 > >>bce1: attempting to allocate 1 MSI vectors (16 supported) > >>msi: routing MSI IRQ 257 to local APIC 16 vector 53 > >>bce1: using IRQ 257 for MSI > >>bce1: Remote PHY : TP > >>bce1: bpf attached > >>bce1: Ethernet address: 00:26:b9:fb:04:0e > >>bce1: ASIC (0x57092000); Rev (C0); Bus (PCIe x4, 2.5Gbps); B/C (5.0.11); > >>Bufs (RX:2;TX:2;PG:8); Flags (SPLT|MSI|Remote PHY(TP)|MFW); MFW (NCSI > >>2.0.5) > >>Coal (RX:6,6,18,18; TX:20,20,80,80) > >>..... > >> > >>I have done a quick test with 100 and 1000 MBit, both working very well. > >Thanks a lot for testing. This patch was made long time ago but I > >haven't had chance to commit it due to lack of access to hardware. > >Because the patch bypasses mii(4) layer and makes it hard to read > >code, I didn't like the patch but it seems the patch makes bce(4) > >usable on blade boxes at least. > >I'll commit the patch next week. > > > >>Its possible to get a Patch for 8 Stable? > >> > >I will do MFC to stable/[7-9]. And bce.rphy.diff should be applied > >cleanly to stable/[7-9]. > > I getting erros with the 8-stable source > Oops, try this one for stable/8. http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/bce/bce.rphy.stable8.diff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120316173215.GB6841>