From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Sep  8 17:58:58 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id RAA20441
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 8 Sep 1995 17:58:58 -0700
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [198.137.146.49])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA20435
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 8 Sep 1995 17:58:55 -0700
Received: from LOCALHOST (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id SAA12263; Fri, 8 Sep 1995 18:57:59 -0600
Message-Id: <199509090057.SAA12263@rover.village.org>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Subject: Re: Non-Intel Hardware and FreeBSD 
Cc: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>, hackers@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 08 Sep 1995 17:49:32 PDT
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 1995 18:57:59 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

[[ comp.muble.mumble.freebsd.mumble discussions ]]

That's where I saw the reference....

: Linux has simply done things differently and if anyone thinks that
: there is One True Way of organizing source code then the only likely
: truth is that they just left college and haven't been in this business
: very long.. :-)

Linux does have an interesting way of organizing their source tree,
but it works for most people, which is all that really matters.

I happen to like the FreeBSD and NetBSD integrated source systems, but
I supposed that Linux's system does have merit as well.

Warner