From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 8 18:46:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64BE16A4CE; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 18:46:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao05.cox.net (lakermmtao05.cox.net [68.230.240.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292DF43D2D; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 18:46:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz ([68.103.32.140]) by lakermmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040608184630.SMYH17850.lakermmtao05.cox.net@mezz>; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:46:30 -0400 Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 13:47:20 -0500 To: "Adam Weinberger" References: <20040608175318.GY72578@toxic.magnesium.net> From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20040608175318.GY72578@toxic.magnesium.net> User-Agent: Opera M2/7.51 (Linux, build 689) cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need feedback/review, a big change in AbiWord2 port. X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 18:46:30 -0000 On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:53:18 -0400, Adam Weinberger wrote: >>> (06.08.2004 @ 0209 PST): Jeremy Messenger said, in 2.3K: << >> Hello, >> >> I have maken a big changes in AbiWord2 port, what I have done: >> >> - Force AbiWord to check/compile everything what apps that are >> installed (headers, libraries, etc) from ports rather than check >> and >> use the stuff that are included in tarball such as wv, zlib, >> libpng, >> popt and etc. > > How much compile time does this save? Just curious. I don't know, never pay attention after over 20 times built AbiWord. Depends on and use the ports tree is the right solution, IMO. :-) >> - Change the default spell from Enchant to Aspell, because it doesn't >> work at all unless you compile Enchant with the Aspell support. I >> think, it's waste to depend on Enchant by default. >> >> Also, I have removed the check of Enchant. I prefer to see force >> user to want use Enchant if they know what to do with it. I need >> the >> help on write the better comment in @${ECHO_CMD} about this. > > I disagree strongly with this. I think that Enchant is a great idea. > Enchant isn't being utilized properly ATM, but it has the propensity to > be a great leap forward in i18n spell-checking. What's your best suggest then? Force Enchant to compile with Aspell support? This is the way that I will allow Enchant to be default. It doesn't make any sense to have something that will not work by default. I think, it's important to have the default that is just work. >> - Add the new WITH_HTML_HELP_BROWSER knob to allow us install the >> Help >> docs. This cover the ports/66623, but I personal still would like >> to >> see use the DOCSDIR path. >> >> The vote is still open for if you dislike put Help docs in Makefile >> and rather to create a seperate port, just give a shout. >> >> Vote: >> =================================== >> mezz = Makefile >> marcus = seperate port, unless Makefile doesn't turn into mess. >> =================================== > > How much space does the installed documentation take up? I think, we shouldn't pay attention to the space as long we have the knob option to disable the Help docs install. It won't make any difference for Makefile w/ knob option vs seperate port. However, the size is about 877 KB (of tacos ;-). Cheers, Mezz > # Adam > > > -- > Adam Weinberger > adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org > adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org > http://www.vectors.cx -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org