From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 21:33:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C5616A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:33:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.sakrejda@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C9043D1D for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:33:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.sakrejda@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so140405wri for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:33:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=LpCap4DwB/1uXSK9pIcI2oSs9Sk5EF8kPhPJrq5EmHV7+tFtF9b6VrvXwsULIJYViCBRjAY4hqeVaJVhWOvDhfS9UO6XNlh8QJrD7D679DLTDjUrm+6oEkxb2XCSw0eF5fSYunSwGQBuqQsIzgEwjkMXw0PF2YPT62c+VtIflS8= Received: by 10.54.125.9 with SMTP id x9mr2750920wrc; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:33:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.133.8 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:33:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:33:03 -0700 From: Maciek Sakrejda To: doc@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Installing and Using FreeBSD with other operating systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Maciek Sakrejda List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:33:05 -0000 Hi, I'm running Win2k and am looking to reinstall it, adding a Linux OS and FreeBSD in the process. I was looking at the document mentioned in the subject line (at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/multi-os/index.html ), and saw that it was somewhat out of date (it discusses Win95 and FAT, but no mention of anything with NTFS). Any idea if this might be updated soon? Or where else to look? It's not clear to me how much of this applies to NTFS and Win2k... Thanks, Maciek