From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 16 09:38:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63FEB106564A; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:38:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1718FC14; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iea17 with SMTP id 17so5336072iea.13 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:38:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=CbYhra64lZI+dFdhicLcGKJVL2oHShkN+GGx66S6moE=; b=h/if3auQ5jXIkslyz9XnZjTvn9wnh+v/1dSgDSmvM/HHEP2ecX3A7R6muWpLqfNeop mLGXqPJkbJb9jq+TQj4gfMVpowlF4kFOAOzr2nK+Y9a6bY1lo/Ri5DXHax7k1iiQ3ddC muZrYqam/iHoXpZq3iFhZ+fChvYz1bTWKDSSZCQ2lFRXNN/7CU9xicwur/CxJkpZZbsE S2BqwkOz5n1Im38V1RLGjfRheURIL+v/XJevsPjEuqUl0DQjOKv5BoJPSbS2rVOngGKa +s1glc0C+5ZdIHODekttkV6Wc8A7+wQFFcGx1ehw6XJsQ0w6qXSxiEbzvA9pL8Xhofjr RErw== Received: by 10.50.190.230 with SMTP id gt6mr1027544igc.49.1347788314217; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:38:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.83.68 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:37:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5054BB1D.4080506@celicom.ru> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 12:37:54 +0300 Message-ID: To: Chris Rees Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Solmin Vladimir Subject: Re: apache 2.2.22_8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:38:35 -0000 On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > On 16 September 2012 10:20, Odhiambo Washington > wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > >> > >> On 16 September 2012 09:32, Odhiambo Washington > >> wrote: > >> > Hi Chris, > >> > > >> > Thanks for this. > >> > > >> > Hopefully, you can modify the Wiki to have this information and even > >> > examples:) > >> > >> There are examples on the Wiki page already, but in a confusing order. > >> I've put in a link, and a tip on how to find UNIQUENAME. > >> > >> > Personally, I use `make config` and have never needed to do much with > >> > /etc/make.conf as regards the ports. > >> > >> True, but some people like to share their make.conf around machines :) > >> > >> Chris > > > > > > My machines are all identical too, except for parameters related to > > $hostname, DNS and passwords. > > I mostly used /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf before, then `make config` and > > now I believe I am gonna switch to /etc/make.conf but only where I must > > finely customize. > > One thing has crossed my mind now: What happens with make -DWITH_* in > this > > new development of optionsNG?? I have manually built ports that way > before. > > And what about those who want to use portinstall -m WITH_OPTx=1 > WITH_OPTy=1, > > etc? > > Still works fine for nearly all ports, but just for apache ports there > appears to be subtle problems with the logic since it's so > complicated. That's why Olli chose to disable the WITH_ option style > for Apache, and I think it was the right decision. > > I would suggest you learn the new (just as simple) syntax and see how > you get on with it :) > > Chris > I was thinking this optionsNG has already been adopted for all ports. Thanks for the examples though. They are good enough for me to learn the ropes.. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler.