Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 19 Sep 1999 15:10:07 -0700
From:      "John Howie" <JHowie@msn.com>
To:        <security@freebsd.org>, "Brett Glass" <brett@lariat.org>
Subject:   Re: Best way to do FTP with NAT and firewall?
Message-ID:  <003f01bf02eb$bc3f0500$fd01a8c0@pacbell.net>
References:  <4.2.0.58.19990917090848.04e582e0@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As a side issue, the man page for FTP is wrong about the port range it uses
for data connections. The man page (in 3.2-RELEASE) says that ports in the
range 40000 to 44999 are used. Checking /usr/include/netinet/in.h you'll
find the portrange is actually 49152 - 65535. And the FTP client uses this
too...

john...


----- Original Message -----
From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
To: <security@freebsd.org>
Sent: Friday, September 17, 1999 8:16 AM
Subject: Best way to do FTP with NAT and firewall?


> I've just set up a firewall for a client using ipfw and natd. Trouble is,
his software seems to be particularly insistent on doing active, rather than
passive, FTP. This poses a problem, of course, because a remote system can't
open just data sockets to one behind the firewall due to NAT.
>
> I've worked with plenty of commercial firewalls that monitor FTP control
connections and spoof the port number for the data sockets. SLiRP does it;
so, apparently, does the pppd that comes with FreeBSD. But I can't find any
documented way to do it with ipfw and natd.
>
> Are there undocumented commands to accomplish this?
>
> --Brett
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
>





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?003f01bf02eb$bc3f0500$fd01a8c0>