From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 26 14:40:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FC7B9B6 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server1.shellworld.net (shellworld.net [69.60.117.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12393EB9 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:40:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server1.shellworld.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server1.shellworld.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC675228B7 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 10:40:37 -0400 (EDT) To: "questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Has the Procedure for Regenerating A FreeBSD Installation Disk Changed? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <11344.1409064037.1@server1.shellworld.net> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 09:40:37 -0500 From: "Martin G. McCormick" Message-Id: <20140826144037.DC675228B7@server1.shellworld.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:40:45 -0000 Roland Smith writes: > Maybe try with GNU tar (archivers/gtar). If that works I think a bug > report is > in order. Maybe libarchive and tar from 10.0 can be backported to > 9-STABLE. It does sound like we have a bug all right. bsdtar appears to be the only implementation of tar that understands ISO9660 images. gtar installed just fine from the ports collection but it simply exits instantly without doing anything when presented with the ISO image. For now, I will work with rsync again and see if that might work plus re-try building another memory stick image which is actually preferable to a re-mastered CD. Thanks to Roland Smith and all others who have provided good suggestions. Martin McCormick