Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:34:18 +0000 From: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>, hackers@freebsd.org, Matthias Andree <mandree@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: man 3 getopt char * const argv[] - is const wrong ? Message-ID: <201102131934.18357.bruce@cran.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <201102131715.p1DHFbM7052163@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <201102131715.p1DHFbM7052163@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 13 February 2011 17:15:37 Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi, > Thanks to all respondents, I'll re-read comments in a bit, > I went searching for reference: > > Matthias wrote: > > the prototype is in line with the Single Unix Specification v4 aka IEEE > > Std. 1003.1-2008 (sorry no URL, I have checked my local copy, check > > <http://www.opengroup.org/>; you can access it free of charge after > > registering name and email address). > > Thanks, but I didn't find it. > ( I used X Open's Search but wan't easy, (I recall fat green > cardboard boxes from XOpen 20+ years back) : impression > remains: opaque unattractive. Part of the attraction of C > was a slim light affordable volume, 1cm thick, well written, > 2 indexes, easy reading, carrying & reference :-) > http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=opengroup+getopt gets results for 1003.1-2004. -- Bruce Cran
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201102131934.18357.bruce>