From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 14 13:47:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 908CA1065676 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asmrookie@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f227.google.com (mail-fx0-f227.google.com [209.85.220.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A158FC13 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:47:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm27 with SMTP id 27so828713fxm.3 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:47:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=jrgLafAiF+wxlVSV2dFpiAztL6qWNLxg/dJCtYDRPUk=; b=m9RWxg+INvlwMR8gs/6IGMCzYr0Z22Xg0hk5eGiPlRBm66R6yEAsiK87u6lcPyjHAm pGzNQsExjnG64/Q0HQT33vy1kyvJboHhQgb481FdHC2m4T7n3nSHTI7yRPiwDoatkp67 HJmg+ok+0n6Xf/QyzEF+PQXAA+tGjO0YUKUZY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=qukpVhCmlzHo4+Tt+KzqW5Y5/YST2aNVi9Yrt5WXUH5MdK7/7jgcGUfRRPFg/MFeYX 1uKQlHJxxJrQxAvpztZvgLlX+rK/JF6UmgEEc/r/GxU3LXh3fHj0eZi388Rz3j/THDj5 7ZNs0GiGBcgFYsNanY/Y1bxc/MephSSbJ2dV0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: asmrookie@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.25.27 with SMTP id x27mr1075205fab.7.1263476846642; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:47:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:47:26 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 45e399c181f51108 Message-ID: <3bbf2fe11001140547m76c97cdby731a73f2008b9324@mail.gmail.com> From: Attilio Rao To: Pete French Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, serenity@exscape.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Lockmgr deadlock on STABLE_8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:47:32 -0000 2010/1/14 Pete French : >> INVARIANTS requires INVARIANT_SUPPORT [sic] in the kernel config (see comments in GENERIC). > > Ah, right, that would explain it. Thanks! INVARIANT_SUPPORT is made mandatory in order to allow non-INVARIANT kernel to be able to handle INVARIANT compiled modules. Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein