From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 3 14:52:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AEB16A4DA for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:52:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580AC43D4C for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:52:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867CE20A5 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:52:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150832085 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:52:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E227633C28; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:52:10 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <20060731203213.GA75233@hades.panopticon> Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:52:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20060731203213.GA75233@hades.panopticon> (Dmitry Marakasov's message of "Tue, 1 Aug 2006 00:32:13 +0400") Message-ID: <864pwtoorp.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: absolute vs. relative offsets in disklabel X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 14:52:16 -0000 Dmitry Marakasov writes: > Recent `disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly' thread gave me a > thought - why do we have absolute offsets in disklabel? We don't, AFAIK. Since the transition to GEOM, the offsets are relative to the start of the containing provider. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no