From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 15 05:54:33 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5102816A41F
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 05:54:33 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com)
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D252243D49
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 05:54:32 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com)
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i31so1139291wra
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 21:54:32 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id;
	b=TY1kHN94zMQ55vGxvS+qE1Dt46KgLapA0z7WKSGRlZAPQsL4pRqKJI0A6PupnfqVkpmGeA8LogR6dvPsPNE37HIUuK1AN8O3yuqaD+80qcTQwCJP+pnv7xttwpyvwCbl9z2pnnw4qc/i0kyLv7AQvD6iHFKfZQCJ/l6UdgNoExk=
Received: by 10.54.72.11 with SMTP id u11mr1760431wra;
	Mon, 14 Nov 2005 21:54:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ( [71.102.14.129])
	by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 9sm1854287wrl.2005.11.14.21.54.31;
	Mon, 14 Nov 2005 21:54:32 -0800 (PST)
From: "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm01@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 21:45:02 -0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
References: <c21e92e20511130557g4ad76176l85beb6ceee078886@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c21e92e20511130557g4ad76176l85beb6ceee078886@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200511142145.05316.ringworm01@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiawei Ye <leafy7382@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why does security/amavisd-new depend on db3?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 05:54:33 -0000

On Sunday 13 November 2005 05:57, Jiawei Ye wrote:
> This has been bothering me for quite a while now. Either portupgrade
> or portmanager reports that amavisd-new depends on db3, when my
> p5-BerkeleyDB depends on db42 (WITH_BDB_VER = 42). Has anyone else
> seen this?
>

Looking at security/amavisd-new and databases/p5-BerkeleyDB it looks like
you have to make sure WITH_BDB_VER=42 is applied to databases/p5-BerkeleyDB,
not security/amavisd-new, is this the case?

WITH_BDB_VER=42 changes nothing I can see for amavisd-new:

amavisd-new>make -V RUN_DEPENDS WITH_BDB_VER=42

/usr/ports/databases/p5-BerkeleyDB

amavisd-new>make -V RUN_DEPENDS

but for p5-BerkeleyDB it does:

p5-BerkeleyDB>make -V LIB_DEPENDS WITH_BDB_VER=42 

	db-4.2.2:/usr/ports/databases/db42

p5-BerkeleyDB>make -V LIB_DEPENDS

       db3.3:/usr/ports/databases/db3

-Mike