From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 4 11:57:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174E5106564A for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:57:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (lefty.soaustin.net [66.135.55.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6738FC20 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:57:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id A15EF8C0CA; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 05:57:22 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 05:57:22 -0600 To: Marius Strobl Message-ID: <20081104115722.GA28394@soaustin.net> References: <20081031124442.GB9102@soaustin.net> <183638.12752.qm@web56802.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <20081031131827.GA9613@soaustin.net> <20081103223042.GB8256@alchemy.franken.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081103223042.GB8256@alchemy.franken.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: Mark Linimon , freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Free Ultra2 in Silicon Valley, USA X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 11:57:23 -0000 On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 11:30:42PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > Anyway, the panic message provided isn't enough info to even > guess what the real cause is. I think I have more notes at home (not accessible ATM). > I think the easiest way to proceed would be to remove the remaining > NIC (is there a reason you disabled gem(4) for the on-board ones?) The kernels that we run are pretty lean; it's possible that that driver is not included. Or, are you talking about something in the hardware setup? > and mass storage controller drivers one by one and see when the > panic goes away. Is this something that can be done remotely? I'm a thousand miles away from the machines :-) > That said, my T1 AC200 is running fine and I've never seen such a > problem with it... These things have an add-in card with 4 more ethernet slots IIRC; could the difference in configuration explain things? mcl