From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Sun Apr 30 20:20:00 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E823D57CF2 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 20:20:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E1607E3 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 20:20:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v3UKK0aH058403 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 20:20:00 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 218943] /bin/sh regression? with doubly negated numbers Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 20:20:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: z7dr6ut7gs@snkmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Works As Intended X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 20:20:00 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D218943 John Hein changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Closed Resolution|--- |Works As Intended --- Comment #2 from John Hein --- I see. Not that bash is necessarily a good model to follow, but it supports the --= /++ operators and is able to distinguish between the context when it's an opera= tor and a double negation. % bash -c 'var=3D--123; echo $(($var)); echo $((--var))' 123 122 % bash -c 'echo $((--123))' 123 Same with/without POSIXLY_CORRECT. But thanks for the explanation. Closing this as 'works as intended'. I gu= ess sh(1) could be enhanced to distinguish - from context - between the operator and a double negation (and only throw the error for the former case). I'm = sure it's quite tricky. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=