From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Aug 19 15:44:27 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19D9DCE6B6 for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 15:44:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@mailbox.org) Received: from mx2.mailbox.org (mx2.mailbox.org [80.241.60.215]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.mailbox.org", Issuer "SwissSign Server Silver CA 2014 - G22" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EABC7D9ED for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 15:44:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@mailbox.org) Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1376646C9B for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 17:44:17 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mailbox.org; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :subject:subject:from:from:message-id:date:date:received; s= mail20150812; t=1503157454; bh=xfidtlXsq8/lsh0aeA0zVo4Q9NnKWg2cY nzzfsgIgAE=; b=XavXxNUwcc8kuDFNusi9IXi40KT+7nrZcaChlGyZCSQelr7xM EgApkxpraqGq5AyFJVO3BVByOSprAg31WsAq0fUlnn9zHUPIwhUJXqgae5PsiP/N sNsKKeCG5vwCyy3otBo5b5wqyUe9tfBhMmSb50RYr0F5truxWhdbX9tu2mU/EWCP +pFTVViG/oiOuFPi/GZ3ukInuOvUQZNYarCUxdVLlUOEHL2GmtY3gZX8Up8c/MV4 Xm33dqYR0x6JFsyp5LJRN/9lyUAmwUhuUNxofo8yCLUGbfJMXHK0eTeXfiVkVv7T U7xN0doC/nFgral1ZuqbiaVuEdM5tOa+LyqYQ== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) by spamfilter02.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter02.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.116]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id djND5vi2etAM for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 17:44:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 17:43:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87tw13tvfr.wl-herbert@mailbox.org> From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it okay to run ports from under poudriere ? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 15:44:28 -0000 On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 15:42:50 +0200, Manish Jain wrote: > Hi, > > I am a FreeBSD user of 15+ years. Of late, I have started contributed to > the community with ports that I have developed myself. > > As a port developer, I am running poudriere for testing my ports. Now it > seems a bit of a waste to me that I have 2 ports trees, each a few GB : > > /usr/ports/ > /usr/local/poudriere/ports/default/ > > So is it okay if I run my ports from /usr/local/poudriere/ports/default/ ? > > If needed I can even symlink /usr/local/poudriere/ports/default as > /usr/ports This is described in the porters handbook: 9.5.6. Using Manually Managed Ports Trees with Poudriere -- Herbert