From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Dec 14 18:38:35 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA09202
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 14 Dec 1997 18:38:35 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: from word.smith.net.au (vh1.gsoft.com.au [203.38.152.122])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA09150
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 14 Dec 1997 18:37:57 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au)
Received: from word (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by word.smith.net.au (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA00578;
	Mon, 15 Dec 1997 13:01:27 +1030 (CST)
Message-Id: <199712150231.NAA00578@word.smith.net.au>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97
To: pb@fasterix.freenix.org (Pierre Beyssac)
cc: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty), freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: patch for oaccept() 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 14 Dec 1997 18:40:21 BST."
             <19971214184021.EU30067@@> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 13:01:27 +1030
From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Amancio Hasty writes:
> > Yes, Q2 works peachy over here without the orecvfrom->recvfrom change.
> 
> I've got one new patch that I just submitted a PR for. This is the
> same problem with oaccept().

OK, I've applied this and closed the PR.  (using PRs means that if I 
forget/can't do it/whatever there's still a record of the problem for 
someone else to work from)

I've also applied the corresponding changes to -stable. It's not 
immediately clear that -stable would actually have suffered the same 
problem, as there have been more than a few detail changes in that area.

Again, any testing results would be appreciated.

mike