From owner-freebsd-bugs  Tue Apr  3 22:10:11 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1281837B727
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Tue,  3 Apr 2001 22:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f345A2407323;
	Tue, 3 Apr 2001 22:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 22:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200104040510.f345A2407323@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Rich Wales <richw@webcom.com>
Subject: Re: i386/26261: silo overflow problem in sio driver
Reply-To: Rich Wales <richw@webcom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR i386/26261; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Rich Wales <richw@webcom.com>
To: WATANABE Kiyoshi <aab10490@pop16.odn.ne.jp>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: i386/26261: silo overflow problem in sio driver
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 22:02:41 -0700 (PDT)

 WATANABE Kiyoshi wrote:
 
     > try this patch.
     > +      cp4ticks *= 10;   /* to avoid buffer overflow */
 
 Thanks.  This helped to some extent, though I'm still seeing some
 silo overflows even with the above patch.  Should the "10" be bumped
 up to something larger, perhaps?
 
 Rich Wales         richw@webcom.com         http://www.webcom.com/richw/
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message