From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 28 17:45:49 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C0716A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:45:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089E643D45
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:45:49 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from interjet.elischer.org ([24.7.73.28])
          by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP
          id <2004062817453801100nrs5se>; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:45:40 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1])
	by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA44042;
	Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040628.095605.13314562.imp@bsdimp.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0406281043320.43751-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: cswiger@mac.com
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat headed for history
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:45:49 -0000


To some extent it can be said that Poul-Henning's proceedure worked..

It must be admitted that:
"supported" -> "HEADSUP" -> objections -> "supported"
is a legitimate and correct outcome, and certainly one of the reasons
that we do the "HEADSUP" part in the first place :-)


On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, M. Warner Losh wrote:

> In message: <40DF2607.5020409@mac.com>
>             Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> writes:
> : In other words, I care quite a bit about how "working, supported 
> : functionality" gets transitioned to "no longer available".  I'm not happy with 
> : the notion of "supported" -> "HEADS UP" -> one week -> gone.
> 
> It appears that this is widely used enough that it won't be removed.
> I agree that this is a too streamlined path.
> 
> Warner
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>