From owner-freebsd-current Thu Dec 21 13:07:45 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA09156 for current-outgoing; Thu, 21 Dec 1995 13:07:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from skiddaw.elsevier.co.uk (skiddaw.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.222.60]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA09144 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 1995 13:07:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from snowdon.elsevier.co.uk (snowdon.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.197.164]) by skiddaw.elsevier.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA11087 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 1995 21:05:58 GMT Received: from cadair.elsevier.co.uk (actually host cadair) by snowdon with SMTP (PP); Thu, 21 Dec 1995 21:06:29 +0000 Received: (from dpr@localhost) by cadair.elsevier.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) id VAA11901; Thu, 21 Dec 1995 21:06:09 GMT From: Paul Richards Message-Id: <199512212106.VAA11901@cadair.elsevier.co.uk> Subject: Re: Impressions of stability ( was Re: FreeBSD-current-stable ??? ) To: nate@rocky.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams) Date: Thu, 21 Dec 1995 21:06:09 +0000 (GMT) Cc: current@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199512212105.OAA03866@rocky.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Dec 21, 95 02:05:39 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply to Nate Williams who said > > This has been the way FreeBSD has worked since day one, and although I yeah I know but I'm still interested in why this happens. -- Paul Richards. Originative Solutions Ltd. Internet: paul@netcraft.co.uk, http://www.netcraft.co.uk Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 1225 447500 (work)