Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 00:22:15 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD ports list <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: NO_OPTIONS_SORT makes options disappear Message-ID: <20120604222215.GH73254@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <4FCD1EC7.9060905@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FCD1EC7.9060905@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--dDnEQgWzhgf+8aPe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 01:47:03PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > The new options framework sorts all of the options by default before > presenting them to the user. I have mixed feelings about this, however > there is supposed to be a workaround for those of us who have grouped > the options for our ports into logical chunks, NO_OPTIONS_SORT. >=20 > Today I tried defining that in my BIND ports so that users would not be > confused during the upgrade process, and got this: >=20 > make config > =3D=3D=3D> No options to configure >=20 > I tried defining NO_OPTIONS_SORT both before and after including > bsd.port.pre.mk, got the same result for both. >=20 > Suggestions welcome, >=20 > Doug >=20 > --=20 >=20 > This .signature sanitized for your protection Have you tried keeping you port as-is or converting it ? Can you send me a diff so that I can have a deeper look tomorrow morning GM= T+1? regards, Bapt --dDnEQgWzhgf+8aPe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/NNRcACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwO3ACggU5wZXW5nWi6lHoW1mZqzZIb oSYAn2WyjJ4Rspc2QxdG4KDrtK6RD5L8 =Wck1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDnEQgWzhgf+8aPe--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120604222215.GH73254>