From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 4 22:22:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2BF1065677; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 22:22:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD968FC1D; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 22:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q54MMImh030976; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 22:22:18 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q54MMId2030953; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 22:22:18 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 00:22:15 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20120604222215.GH73254@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <4FCD1EC7.9060905@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDnEQgWzhgf+8aPe" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FCD1EC7.9060905@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD ports list Subject: Re: NO_OPTIONS_SORT makes options disappear X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 22:22:19 -0000 --dDnEQgWzhgf+8aPe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 01:47:03PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > The new options framework sorts all of the options by default before > presenting them to the user. I have mixed feelings about this, however > there is supposed to be a workaround for those of us who have grouped > the options for our ports into logical chunks, NO_OPTIONS_SORT. >=20 > Today I tried defining that in my BIND ports so that users would not be > confused during the upgrade process, and got this: >=20 > make config > =3D=3D=3D> No options to configure >=20 > I tried defining NO_OPTIONS_SORT both before and after including > bsd.port.pre.mk, got the same result for both. >=20 > Suggestions welcome, >=20 > Doug >=20 > --=20 >=20 > This .signature sanitized for your protection Have you tried keeping you port as-is or converting it ? Can you send me a diff so that I can have a deeper look tomorrow morning GM= T+1? regards, Bapt --dDnEQgWzhgf+8aPe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/NNRcACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwO3ACggU5wZXW5nWi6lHoW1mZqzZIb oSYAn2WyjJ4Rspc2QxdG4KDrtK6RD5L8 =Wck1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDnEQgWzhgf+8aPe--