From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 29 06:25:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B8A16A4BF for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 06:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-107-253.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.107.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA46D43F3F for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 06:25:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3BC66B04; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 06:25:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BE84DA3E; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 06:25:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 06:25:39 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Seth Kingsley Message-ID: <20030829132539.GA29376@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <200308281702.h7SH2x7E021237@planet.krakow.homeunix.com> <20030828155054.GA39979@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> <20030828162707.GA25670@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030828220402.GB42216@mail.meowfishies.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030828220402.GB42216@mail.meowfishies.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Volker Stolz cc: Kuba Lida cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: ymessenger-0.99.19.1,20020902; broken on 5.1-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:25:42 -0000 --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 03:04:02PM -0700, Seth Kingsley wrote: > I also have two reports of people missing stpcpy(). Would it be > possible to link ymessenger.bin against libc.so.5 and then add a small > pre-load library to wrap any missing libc.so.4 calls directly? This > way, 3rd party libraries would still load normally. Unfortunately, this > week is very busy at work, and I don't have a pure 5.1 machine to test > with. I don't think that's guaranteed to work either, although it may operate for now. Having mixed 4.x/5.x libraries in one binary is just not a recipe for success. Kris --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/T1RTWry0BWjoQKURApaUAJsGg6+INVI0hMRNxPX14YcDf56CkwCdHXpG rrGj66OXxbFQq2seXDewcgg= =dKxH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+--