From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 18 12:38:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222F616A4CE for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:38:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from tonij.jolt.nu (as4-6-3.lk.bonet.se [217.215.176.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B40A43D41 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:38:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from c4@portad.se) Received: from na.portad.se (na.nat.jolt.nu [10.0.0.2]) by tonij.jolt.nu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i2IKc53E068882 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 21:38:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from c4@portad.se) Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.2.20040318213242.02464ee8@jolt.nu> X-Sender: c4@jolt.nu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 21:36:54 +0100 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Tobias Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3 version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) Subject: Promise SX4000 Support in -STABLE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:38:13 -0000 Accordingly to the promise handbook this card is supported in FreeBSD4.x http://www.promise.com/support/file/manual/1_FastTrak%20SX%20Series%20UM%20v3.6.pdf However, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=54351+57398+/usr/local/www/db/text/2004/freebsd-performance/20040208.freebsd-performance seems to say that it is NOT supported... Now the question is, who is right? I am leaning toward the freebsd users since promise dosn't even have a driver on their website (alltho they claim that). Has anyone run an SX4000 card with success in freebsd? If so, what kind of speeds when writing could I expect on a RAID 5 (Yes I know that the amount of ram installed should be taken into account but DIMM is cheap...)