From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov 18 05:01:50 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8687B106566B;
	Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:01:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com)
Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6372C8FC14;
	Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:01:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id pAI51f06029856
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:01:41 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com)
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id pAI51fxb029855; 
	Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:01:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com
	(4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA03253; Thu, 17 Nov 11 20:49:07 PST
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:48:49 -0800
From: perryh@pluto.rain.com
To: pav@freebsd.org
Message-Id: <4ec64621.5VnWOe6lq5n/i0BQ%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
References: <3SkrRf563xzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org>
	<1321560805.6735.15.camel@hood.oook.cz>
In-Reply-To: <1321560805.6735.15.camel@hood.oook.cz>
User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: wietse@porcupine.org, sahil+freebsd-ports@tandon.net, garga@freebsd.org,
	freebsd@beardz.net, lists@opsec.eu, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org,
	utisoft@gmail.com
Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:01:50 -0000

Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org> wrote:

> The build jails are configured to have only IPv4 address on lo0,
> but the host have both IPv4 and IPv6 configured on its lo0.

Even disregarding RFC3513, is an IPv6-enabled kernel without an IPv6
address on lo0 a realistic configuration for a "real" FreeBSD system?
If not, I'd think it worthwhile to make pointyhat more realistic.
(Either way, it seems unobjectionable to improve the robustness of
postfix, making it more liberal in what it accepts.)

> Changing the jail configuration is possible but if a reasonable
> workaround can be made in postfix-current port I'd prefer not to
> touch pointyhat configuration (unexpected consequences and all
> that...)

It may be a bit late in the 9.0 release cycle to be messing with the
pointyhat configuration, but an adjustment might be considered after
9.0-RELEASE is done.