From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 12:31:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1532737B401; Mon, 19 May 2003 12:31:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847C943FA3; Mon, 19 May 2003 12:31:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (ru@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h4JJVKEd081917 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 19 May 2003 22:31:20 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.12.9/8.12.8/Submit) id h4JJVKQf081912; Mon, 19 May 2003 22:31:20 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 22:31:20 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: re@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20030519193120.GB79469@sunbay.com> References: <3EC825C4.6040203@btc.adaptec.com> <20030519024518.05B402A7EA@canning.wemm.org> <20030519061401.GB40604@sunbay.com> <20030519192119.GA4267@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030519192119.GA4267@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: Tidying src/release/*/{dokern.sh,drivers.conf} X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 19:31:28 -0000 --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 12:21:19PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 09:14:01AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > I can see the point in having only a module, but then > > I could say I was confused by sparc64/GENERIC which > > has both. >=20 > sparc64/GENERIC was the old-man out. I feel we should return > {i386,alpha,ia64}/GENERIC back to their previous way of no ispfw since > this is quite late in the 5.1 game to be changing this. I then think we > should ponder making sparc64 consistent with {i386,alpha,ia64}/GENERIC. > =20 I do not object. Removing it now from sparc64/GENERIC would be premature since sparc64 does not have drivers.conf, and this would give us the BOOTMFS without it, and without being able to load it as a module. It may be even worth leaving the ispfw commented out in the GENERIC configs, and explain why it is commented out here. (ia64/GENERIC I didn't even touch.) Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+yTEIUkv4P6juNwoRAhfIAJ92u57sc6SUZpjaQQChHgwVEJrtnwCfXFzm FnG4L4ViO9YAzq0kUuXbbQ8= =g2ih -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/--