From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 31 18:56:45 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD8B106566C;
	Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:56:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws)
Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F148FC13;
	Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:56:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from phenom.cordula.ws (phenom [192.168.254.60])
	by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E09A382CD;
	Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:56:42 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:56:42 +0100
From: cpghost <cpghost@cordula.ws>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20100131185642.GB87229@phenom.cordula.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: wes@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: devel/poco-ssl BROKEN. Can I use TRYBROKEN?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:56:45 -0000

Hi,

devel/poco-ssl has been marked
  BROKEN= bad plist
for some time now.

Since I urgently need it for devel work, and as I would prefer
to use the port rather than compile POCO directly (which works
too), I'm considering bypassing this BROKEN setting with:

  .if ${.CURDIR:M*/devel/poco-ssl}
  TRYBROKEN=yes
  .endif

in /etc/make.conf.

Is it okay, until devel/poco-ssl is fixed?

Oh, btw, I'm still missing the poco-doc port which pulls in
the POCO documentation. :-(

Thanks,
-cpghost.

-- 
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/