From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 10:40:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2322416A402; Wed, 16 May 2007 10:40:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from redbull.bpaserver.net (redbullneu.bpaserver.net [213.198.78.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBED013C487; Wed, 16 May 2007 10:40:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p54A5FC6A.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.252.106]) by redbull.bpaserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91EE2E1CF; Wed, 16 May 2007 12:40:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (webmail.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.102]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8365B48A3; Wed, 16 May 2007 12:40:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l4GAe2ut035005; Wed, 16 May 2007 12:40:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Wed, 16 May 2007 12:40:02 +0200 Message-ID: <20070516124002.6g6ox6y28048ws4g@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:40:02 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav References: <200705160846.l4G8kaYr074481@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200705160846.l4G8kaYr074481@repoman.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.4) / FreeBSD-7.0 X-BPAnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-BPAnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BPAnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-14.864, required 8, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -15.00, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME 0.00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14) X-BPAnet-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-Spam-Status: No Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile Makefile.inc1 X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 10:40:23 -0000 Quoting Dag-Erling Smorgrav (from Wed, 16 May 2007 =20 08:46:36 +0000 (UTC)): > des 2007-05-16 08:46:36 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > . Makefile Makefile.inc1 > Log: > Expose all of {check,delete}-old{,-dirs,-files,-libs}. The delete-old target only removes static libs. Yes, they are libs, =20 but they are not used in a life system, they are only used while =20 developing. That's the reason why I didn't add "libraries" to the =20 description of the delete-old target. The delete-old-libs target =20 exists to remove shared libs, which you should not do unconditionally =20 on a system (make sure no ports uses them anymore). For the check-old target there's no reason to split up the targets, as =20 you can list them unconditionally. For developing convenience I did =20 chose to have the check-old-XXX targets in Makefile.inc1 ("make -f =20 Makefile.inc1 TARGET" works just fine). I see no need to expose all =20 targets. So please revert this or do a forced commit to provide a good reason =20 why they need to be exposed. As your recent commits to the delete-old/check-old part created a lot =20 of mails and follow up commits because of them, I suggest to discuss =20 further changes to the targets before committing the changes. Bye, Alexander. --=20 Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art. =09=09-- Charles McCabe http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137