Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:59:44 +0300
From: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, brooks@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ppc or powerpc for ${ARCH}
Message-ID: <20060428155944.GA17713@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>
In-Reply-To: <20060428133740.GA22436@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
References: <20060428063226.GA89510@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <20060428133740.GA22436@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:37:40AM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:32:26AM +0300, Vasil Dimov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >=20
> > I noticed that audio/mbrola and net/globus4 are testing for the PowerPC
> > architecture with ${ARCH} =3D=3D "ppc", while 14 other ports use the st=
ring
> > "powerpc" instead of "ppc".
> >=20
> > Is there something wrong with this?
>=20
> One of the options is presumably wrong, but not having access to a
> machine I don't know which. Probably ppc is wrong. Perhaps someone
> with actual hardware could comment.
>=20
According to src/sys/powerpc/include/param.h the correct
one is "powerpc".
--=20
Vasil Dimov
gro.DSBeerF@dv
Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence.
-- Edsger W. Dijkstra
--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFEUjvwFw6SP/bBpCARAsYZAJ9B21TWD0U0VQsJM9JDYcK3jh3ltQCfX1+o
NcY0acyPH/xknHlAPmeZDPk=
=DuQR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060428155944.GA17713>