From owner-cvs-all Mon Jun 11 3:40:17 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E90837B401; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 03:40:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheldonh@starjuice.net) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.seasidesoftware.co.za) by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 159P7D-0009Fz-00; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:40:11 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: "David W. Chapman Jr." , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/samba-devel Makefile ports/net/samba-devel/filespatch-ba In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:35:57 +0300." <3B249F0D.AEB3C403@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:40:11 +0200 Message-ID: <35586.992256011@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:35:57 +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Yes, but in this case *nothing* is changed in the behaviour of the > package, because bento knows nothing about WITH_CUPS option, therefore > packages built after the change will be exactly the same as ones built > before. Oh I see. So if I enable a feature that wasn't enabled before, or disable one that was, it's okay for me to bump PORTREVISION? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message