Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Mar 2018 13:01:28 -0400
From:      Charles Sprickman <spork@bway.net>
To:        Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>
Cc:        Chuck Tuffli <chuck@tuffli.net>, Mark Saad <nonesuch@longcount.org>, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: smart(8) Call for Testing
Message-ID:  <A548BC90-815C-4C66-8E27-9A6F7480741D@bway.net>
In-Reply-To: <1d3f2cef-4c37-782e-7938-e0a2eebc8842@quip.cz>
References:  <4754cb2f-76bb-a69b-0cf5-eff4d621eb29@callfortesting.org> <CAMXt9NbdN119RrHnZHOJD1T%2BHNLLpzgkKVStyTm=49dopBMoAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAM0tzX1oTWTa0Nes11yXg5x4c30MmxdUyT6M1_c4-PWv2%2BQbhw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMXt9NYMrtTNqNSx256mcYsPo48xnsa%2BCCYSoeFLzRsc%2BfQWMw@mail.gmail.com> <CAM0tzX32v2-=saT5iB4WVcsoVOtH%2BXE0OQoP7hEDB1xE%2Bxk%2Bsg@mail.gmail.com> <1d3f2cef-4c37-782e-7938-e0a2eebc8842@quip.cz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> On Mar 27, 2018, at 12:45 PM, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> =
wrote:
>=20
> Chuck Tuffli wrote on 2018/03/27 16:32:
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 1:59 PM, Mark Saad <nonesuch@longcount.org> =
wrote:
>> ...
>>> I was thinking more along the lines of when smartctl reports the =
overall-health
>>> which is always a good time to read; and very Monty Python-eske
>>>=20
>>> SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: FAILED!
>>> Drive failure expected in less than 24 hours. SAVE ALL DATA.
>>>=20
>>> =
https://serverfault.com/questions/114196/smart-warns-me-but-i-dont-trust-i=
t
>> This app is different from others in that it only reports the values;
>> it is up to the user / script / etc. to provide analysis. In the
>> serverfault example, spin-up time is attribute ID 3. One of my drives
>> shows:
>> $ smart -t da0 | grep "208 3"
>> 208 3 39 0 100 100 1029
>> smartctl shows it as follows
>> $ smartctl -A /dev/da0
>> ...
>>   3 Spin_Up_Time            0x0027   100   100   001    Pre-fail
>> Always       -       1029
>> It would be up to the user or script to decide at what point this
>> might indicate an imminent failure.
>=20
> What is the purpose of this utility and why it should be in base if =
almost everyone will need to write something to do the "real job" or =
"pkg install smartmontools=E2=80=9D.

I have to agree - this is kind of a prior-century tool as far as user =
friendliness it seems.

What is the goal of this tool?  The main use for smartmontools seems to =
be to pluck information about the drive and act on some very specific =
items (for example, polling the =E2=80=9Cmedia wearout indicator=E2=80=9D =
on SSDs is very useful, or read error rates on HDs.  But the =
smartmontools folks seem to spend a fair amount of time with putting =
drive data in their tool so that meaningful data is presented to the =
user.  Without that level of functionality out of the box, what=E2=80=99s =
the argument for this being in base vs. being a 3rd party tool that =
lives in the ports tree?  Think of the people that answer mailing list =
and forum questions when considering adding something like this to =
base=E2=80=A6

Again, maybe I=E2=80=99m just missing something or maybe this is here =
for a particular vendor that needs it or something.

Charles

>=20
> Maybe I just don't see something...
>=20
> Miroslav Lachman
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs =
<https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>;
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org =
<mailto:freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org>"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A548BC90-815C-4C66-8E27-9A6F7480741D>