From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Feb 21 17:56:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9367AAF1C9 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:56:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alphachi@mediaspirit.org) Received: from mail-vk0-x232.google.com (mail-vk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AD001500 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:56:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alphachi@mediaspirit.org) Received: by mail-vk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id e6so112067277vkh.2 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 09:56:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediaspirit-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ZcxYRkENLBV84p8P11UWgNOpqGkGGQ1DGWM1iwkssDE=; b=rODXqoTxsLMSYO6BU5grWhJSO/bY/p5B7BcjjOE6FeISzu9POH3Sr5EZdDDadM8+o+ C4mfbl+y2U0VsSuLXo9aNNvNbLiDhUgK8l5KtSiaF0Fx3L7Yrlyp23YEZOXd3qdnXKap p4X1DCABfnTi+EW/lMGcfx+feEJ8PGwNqWL++SpXwjQ2Y2RBNpP1q9FFscKMatJP2t0r BID0GcB2Z89uVvceENkT2x8lrFMiTBaZrEMHdmFafycQ7ykGC2F77J9RZdxE5b1TkhDv wu/CWpjLP/apL/6YWrzpWeczbPycr0PoJ195YkYYWpfqLn0isw14EMhkckaU75uq1cgt XjuQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ZcxYRkENLBV84p8P11UWgNOpqGkGGQ1DGWM1iwkssDE=; b=YQk602pq49Djn13dt1Zu5aOmcZNaD/6A2nq35gCrnlqBx5nFl47+MQtwKxo3eZgsPM hH5fvP8u0LAnGpDnsx1dDZJHctVwB5WNmD/C9sRDtsTpChhiSw+4Q7b6nm28IY7ojKj0 wUMQJHZRejwNpk5KE2YcWXRB8tuBEX6J6D30hW6YBRP8TDj6ZPgpa0POCMp/kQPFk5GK 5CMrxhY7juwuRybCQv+VvnsyG4K5C0m+xMOxvbM+eQBUuD79MFKLwjwEAsKF3783e83E kSAYnn0EbNziG3+nwMVLlLqGknCbytEN/M5eOvWHYYweSZvnuVEvyKOHHmkjg5PfsR48 tjBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORpvcMd4xnhIQSfiCnIGZD1RwS1BO+PqQNSNQ4p3cCVUljk5JYtDW+G9RJ7E5pb2M7L1pYiOcbrL2P7uA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.47.200 with SMTP id v191mr21334038vkv.116.1456077397995; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 09:56:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.31.33.13 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 09:56:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:56:37 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: The vt(4) resolution is always 640x480 From: alphachi To: "list: freebsd" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:56:41 -0000 The laptop is ThinkPad X250 (Broadwell GPU) and the LCD resolution is 1366x768. I have set booting from UEFI only and disabled CSM. The whole disk is encrypted by GELI except /boot/. On 10.2-STABLE, the LCD resolution can be recognized rightly without any configure in /boot/loader.conf. The information about this in dmesg is: ... FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512 VT(efifb): resolution 1366x768 CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-5200U CPU @ 2.20GHz (2194.96-MHz K8-class CPU) ... But when the system is upgraded to 10.3-BETA2, the only resolution is 640x480 whether console or Xorg. The information about this in dmesg is: ... FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512 VT(efifb): resolution 640x480 CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-5200U CPU @ 2.20GHz (2194.96-MHz K8-class CPU) ... I try to write the new EFI file using: dd if=/boot/boot1.efifat of=/dev/ada0p1 or add something in /boot/loader.conf like: kern.vt.fb.default_mode="1366x768" No effect. How to deal this? Thanks!