From owner-freebsd-smp Fri Mar 24 18:38: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ACCC37B52D for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 18:38:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from slave (doug@slave [10.0.0.1]) by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA07955; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 18:37:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 18:37:54 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton X-Sender: doug@dt051n0b.san.rr.com To: Christian Weisgerber Cc: freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PR #17479: parallel building of ports In-Reply-To: <20000325015218.A43375@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > I received absolutely *no* reaction in response to PR ports/17479 > which suggests a minimal change to allow reliable parallel building > (i.e. make -jX) of ports. > > I can't imagine that I'm the only person with an SMP box who cares > about this. You will probably get more of a reaction by goading the folks in -ports. :) Doug -- "So, the cows were part of a dream that dreamed itself into existence? Is that possible?" asked the student incredulously. The master simply replied, "Mu." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message