From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 05:58:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C1416A4B3; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 05:58:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de (mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de [193.174.154.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7AF43F93; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 05:58:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de) Received: from beagle (beagle [193.175.132.100])h8GCwMs19465; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:58:22 +0200 (MEST) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:58:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Harti Brandt To: Ruslan Ermilov In-Reply-To: <20030916125421.GA29688@sunbay.com> Message-ID: <20030916145741.H9151@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> References: <20030911142821.S69286@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20030915223155.GQ64655@roark.gnf.org> <20030916125421.GA29688@sunbay.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade from static to dynamic root X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: harti@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 12:58:26 -0000 On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: RE>On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 03:31:55PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: RE>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:44:55PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: RE>> > RE>> > Hi, RE>> > RE>> > I just tried to upgrade one of my systems from a static root from july to RE>> > an actual dynamic root. The installworld went fine 'til the place where RE>> > /bin/test is installed. At that point the installation stopped with "ELF RE>> > interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found". And really /libexec is not RE>> > populated yet. May it be, that the makefile uses one of the newly RE>> > installed tools during install? For example 'ln' to make the link test -> RE>> > [? RE>> > RE>> > Also, wouldn't it be helpful to populate /rescue before /bin? Just in RE>> > the case something goes wrong between installing been and rescue for the RE>> > first time? RE>> RE>> A dynamic root is still a little bit of a no seatbelt kind of activity. RE>> We should probably bring back the ${OBJDIR}/bin/sh test and if we fail, RE>> install /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 then reattempt the ${OBJDIR}/bin/sh test RE>> and continue on with life. RE>> RE>I've been able to reproduce this, and have just committed a fix for this RE>into Makefile.inc1. Nice to hear, thanks. harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de, harti@freebsd.org