From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Oct 19 21:23:39 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2921FE6C14 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:23:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CFE8E359 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:23:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 251FAFE6C09; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032D9FE6C07 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:23:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97CE18E353 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:23:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD9DBF935 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:23:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9JLNaP2048395 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:23:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w9JLNaRJ048385 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:23:36 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230298] graphics/mesa-dri: update to 18.2.3 Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:23:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:23:39 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230298 Jan Beich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|graphics/mesa-dri: update |graphics/mesa-dri: update |to 18.2.2 |to 18.2.3 --- Comment #12 from Jan Beich --- (In reply to Warner Losh from comment #9) > The rationale for the rejection seems clear to me: He's stated that the n= ew > MESA hasn't been tested. - there was public call for testing on ports@ + x11@ mailing lists; only 1 = user heeded it but didn't confirm if anything has regressed or not (compared to = have never worked on the specific hardware/drm version) - x11@ team QA is opaque i.e., not clear how their testing is better or why shoving patches to an external repo would magically attract testers > There's efforts under way to get a test suite in place to rectify that > problem. How a test suite is going to help with the lack of GPU variety? IIRC, one of the *former* x11@ peers had a lab of hardware to test things against but di= dn't last long as such a job isn't fun for a volunteer. > and there's been no articulated reasons why a new version is needed. - New hardware support - Support for newer OpenGL versions - Better Vulkan support - Better support for new LLVM versions=20 - Upstream support (Mesa 18.1.* reached EOL after 18.2.1 release; LLVM 6 reached EOL after LLVM 7 release) FreeBSD only has one Mesa version in ports tree atm, and it has to support everything: from ancient hardware on the oldest FreeBSD version to the shiny new stuff on -CURRENT. Old users maybe complacent with what little features FreeBSD currently provides but new users want more, often stuff available a= s a given on Linux. Perfect stability is hard to reach without telemetry, anywa= y. > This close to a FreeBSD release, we should be conservative in how we appr= oach > this and make sure things work. MFH to 2018Q4 isn't planned here. Are you implying FreeBSD 12.0 will not sh= ip before 2019Q1? Otherwise, /quarterly is a moving target and keeping POLA wh= ile backporting regressions is a usual occurence but the state is reset each cycle/quarter (along with binary packages). (In reply to Warner Losh from comment #10) > Confusing that you set maintainer feedback to '+' for this, but there you= go. maintainer-approval is an attachment flag unlike maintainer-feedback which = is a bug flag. Mesa 18.2 is a moving target, so there's no attachment. I've requested review (not approval) since the first RC to give x11@ team plenty= of time but so far have received only some homework questions that don't count= as review, much less testing. (In reply to Warner Losh from comment #11) > Also, migrating to a new version of MESA may muddy the waters for the drm= to ports conversion we're undergoing, drm-legacy-kmod doesn't support FreeBSD < 12, so this has always been the c= ase. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=