From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Sep 20 19:22:38 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA02521
          for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 19:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA02454
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 19:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA20315;
	Sun, 20 Sep 1998 19:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>,
        "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co>,
        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: More on the Intel-UNIX standard 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 20 Sep 1998 18:33:03 PDT."
             <199809210133.SAA01361@rah.star-gate.com> 
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 19:22:10 -0700
Message-ID: <20311.906344530@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> All the more reason for someone with some time to get involved now rather
> than later and finding out that there are significant architecture drawbacks
> which could possibily make UDI unfeasible for FreeBSD.

Someone with some time...  Someone with some time...  Hmmmm.  Sorry
Amancio, I'm drawing a complete blank.  Who would you be referring to
here, exactly?  :-)

- Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message