From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Sep 17 14:49:21 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id OAA27570 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 17 Sep 1995 14:49:21 -0700 Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA27565 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 1995 14:49:15 -0700 Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id OAA00875; Sun, 17 Sep 1995 14:47:28 -0700 Message-Id: <199509172147.OAA00875@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95 To: Jim Lowe cc: hackers@freefall.freebsd.org, multimedia@rah.star-gate.com Subject: Re: Sound driver in 2.1 / 2.2.. In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 17 Sep 1995 16:21:20 CDT." <199509172121.QAA09851@miller.cs.uwm.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 17 Sep 1995 14:47:27 -0700 From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>> Jim Lowe said: > > From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." > > When the CS4231 side of things gets smooth out we will make /dev/dsp0 > > and /dev/dsp1 access the CS4231 side of the GUS, if there are no > > technical objections;additionally, if /dev/dsp2 and /dev/dsp3 could > > then access the GF1 side of things. > > The only objection I can think of would be the mixer. Can the > cs4231 mixer control the synth and midi side of things or is that controlled > by the GF1 mixer code? If it the latter, then things can get confusing if > one has a gus vs gus-max card. > > -Jim We should also make /dev/mixer1 for the CS4231 to be the default one (/dev/mixer) since this is the actual mixer which controls the GUS MAX. Regards, Amancio