From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jan 30 09:39:14 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id JAA05888 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 30 Jan 1995 09:39:14 -0800 Received: from seahunt.imat.com (seahunt.imat.COM [140.174.70.10]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA05882 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 1995 09:39:06 -0800 Received: (from nelson@localhost) by seahunt.imat.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id JAA00848 for questions@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 30 Jan 1995 09:36:50 -0800 From: User Nelson Message-Id: <199501301736.JAA00848@seahunt.imat.com> Subject: sup and SNAP To: questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 30 Jan 1995 09:36:49 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: nelson@seahunt.imat.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 667 Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As a FreeBSD newbie, I'm confused about lots of things... ;-) However, my current confusion (and this post) are about the relationship between the SNAP release (which is what I am running) and the "sup" upgrade process. If I run sup, will I actually be DOWNGRADING my source code to the 2.0 (current) level? I've read the sup man page and the sup.FAQ, and it's not really clear to me. If the above is true, is there a way to get intermediate fixes for the SNAP release(s)? - Michael - -- Michael Nelson nelson@seahunt.imat.com San Francisco, CA http://www.imat.com/consult.html VOICE: 1-415-621-2608