Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:29:48 -0700 From: Oleg Moskalenko <oleg.moskalenko@citrix.com> To: 'Chris Rees' <crees@freebsd.org>, Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available Message-ID: <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2A6@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> In-Reply-To: <CADLo83_r3SgYj6apifN6NTCwZ-ApYbLkyMOS5zcCmTFst_Vcow@mail.gmail.com> References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <44pqcd8yhd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <CADLo83_r3SgYj6apifN6NTCwZ-ApYbLkyMOS5zcCmTFst_Vcow@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
There is no option "-2" in the new BSD sort or in the GNU sort. There is no= such option in Posix standard, too. What is this option about, do we need to add something ? Thanks Oleg -----Original Message----- From: utisoft@gmail.com [mailto:utisoft@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Chris Rees Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:50 PM To: Lowell Gilbert Cc: Gabor Kovesdan; Oleg Moskalenko; freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available On 15 March 2012 19:18, Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> writes: > >> some time ago I started writing a BSDL sort variant from scratch since >> the OpenBSD version did not support multibyte locales and was hard to >> modify. The development was a bit stalled but recently, Oleg >> Moskalenko <oleg.moskalenko@citrix.com> showed interest in continuing >> this version and he has made a very good job on this BSD sort >> variant. Now it is compatible with the base version of GNU sort but >> the performance in most cases (string sort and -n) is quite behind GNU >> sort (although with -g it is about *4 times* faster). Oleg is still >> working on optimizing the code and the long-term plan is to drop GNU >> sort once this variant is good enough to replace it. For now, it is >> only available in Ports Collection as textproc/bsdsort but if there is >> no objection or any serious bug report I plan to add it to base >> installed as bsdsort, being GNU sort still the default sort until it >> proves that we can safely drop GNU sort. If you are interested in this >> sort utility, could you please try the port and report us any issue >> that you experience? > > portsdb(1) (from portupgrade) doesn't seem to like it; > apparently it is missing a '-2' option, which I haven't > tracked down yet... Fails with gnusort too anyway: [crees@pegasus]~% gsort -2 gsort: invalid option -- '2' Try `gsort --help' for more information. [crees@pegasus]~% Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2A6>