Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 17:17:54 -0400 From: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> To: Patrick Seal <patseal@hyperhost.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PORTVERSION illegal? Message-ID: <20000523171754.D4782@argon.blackdawn.com> In-Reply-To: <20000523164342.A44612@hyperhost.net>; from patseal@hyperhost.net on Tue, May 23, 2000 at 04:43:42PM -0400 References: <20000523164342.A44612@hyperhost.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 04:43:42PM -0400, Patrick Seal wrote:
> In porting bashish portlint reports: (that's a lot of ports in one sentence!)
Ah God, I had a bitch of a time trying to port that inhuman piece of,
err. . wretched software six months ago. ;-)
*shaking head*
> FATAL: PORTVERSION looks illegal. should modify "SR1.1.1".
>
> Is SR1.1.1 illegal? should I change it to 1.1.1 and use DISTNAME?
Yeah, that's probably the best idea.
PORTVERSION= 1.1.1
DISTNAME= ${PORTNAME}-SR${PORTVERSION}
Or similar.
--
Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>
GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+
G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000523171754.D4782>