From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 4 16:49:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F671065670; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:49:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xcllnt@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout027.mac.com (asmtpout027.mac.com [17.148.16.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59BE98FC0C; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:49:25 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from macbook-pro.jnpr.net (natint3.juniper.net [66.129.224.36]) by asmtp027.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KXB003SRTE1XA00@asmtp027.mac.com>; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:49:14 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-1002040138 From: Marcel Moolenaar In-reply-to: <4B6A8981.5090200@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:49:12 -0800 Message-id: References: <4B68A18E.1030500@FreeBSD.org> <305C4541-4245-45C9-9FCC-9C6AF4E47DD6@mac.com> <4B68A812.40103@FreeBSD.org> <971A22CA-B14A-4CBC-8D6D-FEB3A4EA2425@mac.com> <4B68B7AC.8050908@FreeBSD.org> <4B69F782.5050108@FreeBSD.org> <800D6F19-6286-4ECB-84D8-F9E37F529552@mac.com> <4B6A8981.5090200@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Motin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: "current@freebsd.org mailing list" Subject: Re: CAM verbosity (xpt_release_devq(0): requested 1 > present 0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:49:25 -0000 On Feb 4, 2010, at 12:46 AM, Alexander Motin wrote: > Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >> On Feb 3, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Alexander Motin wrote: >> >>> Do you receive message like "tagged openings now %d" in verbose log? It >>> should be there if queue size was adjusted. >> >> No, that's the problem and it has always been the problem: the >> queue never gets adjusted, because when the "adjust openings" >> request is sent up with, say, 120 openings, there are already >> 121 or more requests queued. This prevents the queue from >> being adjusted (XPT fails, doesn't propagate an error down but >> expects any interested drivers to try again in case of a >> failure)... > > I don't think you are right here. Ok :-) -- Marcel Moolenaar xcllnt@mac.com