From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Mar 14 07:54:06 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA14165
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 14 Mar 1996 07:54:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA14155
          for <hackers@freefall.freebsd.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 1996 07:54:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id IAA09264; Thu, 14 Mar 1996 08:31:39 -0700
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 08:31:39 -0700
From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199603141531.IAA09264@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>, "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" <kaleb@x.org>,
        hackers@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: new malloc/libc... 
In-Reply-To: <8072.826787455@time.cdrom.com>
References: <199603131557.IAA03216@rocky.sri.MT.net>
	<8072.826787455@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Jordan K. Hubbard writes:
> > I think you misunderstand.  The next release of FreeBSD will be 2.1.5,
> 
> Really?  News to me!  :-)
> 
> David and I have been assuming 2.1.1 as the proposed release number
> ever since the beginning, though 2.1.5 wouldn't particularly phase
> me I guess.  Hmmmmmm.

It makes more sense to have a .5 release to follow convention, but in
any case I was attempting to communicate that the next release would be
different from 2.1.


Nate