Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 02:32:48 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: stable/8 nfsd: is it normal to have one worker regardless of -n setting? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1108010232241.66711@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear colleagues. just noticed that contemporary nfsd does not fork children in accordance to -n setting: stable/8: root@beaver:/usr/local/tb/scripts# pid nfs 1745 ?? Is 0:00.02 nfsd: master (nfsd) 1746 ?? S 0:03.29 nfsd: server (nfsd) root@beaver:/usr/local/tb/scripts# grep nfs_server_flags /etc/rc.conf nfs_server_flags="-u -t -n 4" stable/7: marck@kucha:~> pid nfs 654 ?? Is 0:00.01 nfsd: master (nfsd) 655 ?? I 0:05.64 nfsd: server (nfsd) 656 ?? I 0:00.00 nfsd: server (nfsd) 657 ?? I 0:00.00 nfsd: server (nfsd) 658 ?? I 0:00.00 nfsd: server (nfsd) marck@kucha:~> grep nfs_server_flags /etc/rc.conf marck@kucha:~> grep nfs_server_flags /etc/defaults/rc.conf nfs_server_flags="-u -t -n 4" # Flags to nfsd (if enabled). is it normal/expected? Thanks! -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1108010232241.66711>