Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 1 Dec 2000 14:21:26 -0600
From:      Alan Cox <alc@cs.rice.edu>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Cc:        alc@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: why doesn't aio use at_exit(9)?
Message-ID:  <20001201142126.E26574@cs.rice.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20001201120848.C8051@fw.wintelcom.net>; from Alfred Perlstein on Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 12:08:48PM -0800
References:  <20001201020257.R8051@fw.wintelcom.net> <20001201135634.D26574@cs.rice.edu> <20001201120848.C8051@fw.wintelcom.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 12:08:48PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Alan Cox <alc@cs.rice.edu> [001201 11:56] wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 02:02:58AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > > why doesn't aio use at_exit(9) instead of requiring an explicit
> > > call in kern_exit.c for aio_rundown?
> > > 
> > 
> > There's no reason that I'm aware of.  Unless you're in a hurry,
> > I'll add that change to a cleanup patch that I have in the pipe.
> 
> Er, how much of a cleanup do you have?  The only work I've done
> so far is to remove all the #ifdef VFS_AIO's in the file, if you
> could commit your cleanup soon it would help. :)
> 

If you're already working on converting aio to use at_exit,
go ahead.  It won't interfere with my work.

Alan




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001201142126.E26574>