Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 07:42:27 -0600 From: Ade Lovett <ade@lovett.com> To: Jim Mock <jim@luna.cdrom.com> Cc: Paul Richards <paul@originative.co.uk>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: gtk-engines Message-ID: <20000229074227.E93698@lovett.com> In-Reply-To: <20000228224710.A1144@luna.cdrom.com>; from jim@luna.cdrom.com on Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 10:47:10PM -0800 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002282204310.15451-100000@ppp-port1-12.tranquility.net> <20000228222905.A825@luna.cdrom.com> <38BB6957.293F3903@originative.co.uk> <20000228224710.A1144@luna.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 10:47:10PM -0800, Jim Mock wrote: > > It comes from ImageMagick.. /usr/ports/graphics/ImageMagick. I guess I > should've mentioned that :-) I've Cc'd this back to -ports because I > forgot to do so. Also, be warned, ImageMagick has a bunch of > dependencies, one of which is ghostscript, which has a bunch of > dependencies. Perhaps gtk-engines should have a dependency on that > beast? Actually, it's not ImageMagick that's the culprit, it's graphics/imlib. If you just do a "make configure" on this port, you'll see a whole shedload of other things it looks for as helper applications, (ImageMagick, netpbm, povray, jbigkit, hdf etc.. etc..) as well as all the usual culprits. I can probably sit down and work out the exact list and add them in as either LIB or BUILD DEPENDS, but it's going to dramatically increase the complexity of things. As a side note, the above is just one of the reasons the GNOME folks are in the process of dropping imlib out of the proverbial 33rd storey window.. with the complexity of _their_ systems, this should be telling everybody something about imlib :) -aDe -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000229074227.E93698>