From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 27 09:45:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562F9E43 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:45:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rainer@ultra-secure.de) Received: from mail.ultra-secure.de (mail.ultra-secure.de [78.47.114.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DE18FC08 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10723 invoked by uid 89); 27 Dec 2012 09:44:52 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 10718, pid: 10720, t: 0.1513s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.97.3/m:54/d:16133 Received: from unknown (HELO suse3) (rainer@ultra-secure.de@212.71.117.1) by mail.ultra-secure.de with ESMTPA; 27 Dec 2012 09:44:52 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:44:51 +0100 From: Rainer Duffner To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Question: /usr/sbin/pkg vs /usr/local/sbin/pkg in 9.1 Message-ID: <20121227104451.6fc6bfed@suse3> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:45:03 -0000 Hi, as I see it, pkgng is actually included in 9.1 as /usr/sbin/pkg, right? But when I define WITH_PKGNG=yes in /etc/make.conf the ports-system wants to install the pkgng-package (because it looks for pkgng in /usr/local/sbin). Is there a way to say "I have the pkg tool in base already"? Or is the pkg in base supposed to just install the pkgng from ports? Best Regards, Rainer