From owner-freebsd-mobile Tue Aug 24 22:56:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63071151FA for ; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 22:51:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA77209; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 23:51:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id XAA52703; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 23:52:28 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199908250552.XAA52703@harmony.village.org> To: Mike Smith Subject: Re: PCMCIA development info Cc: Mark Murray , freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 24 Aug 1999 22:11:29 PDT." <199908250511.WAA00735@dingo.cdrom.com> References: <199908250511.WAA00735@dingo.cdrom.com> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 23:52:28 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <199908250511.WAA00735@dingo.cdrom.com> Mike Smith writes: : And that's about how it's claimed to work. I gather that some portions of this alleged procedure match reality less well than other portions of this alleged procedure. And that the discrepancy might be causing frustration to you... :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message