Date: Sat, 23 May 1998 20:23:35 +0100 From: njs3@doc.ic.ac.uk (Niall Smart) To: Studded <Studded@san.rr.com>, ac199@hwcn.org Cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@ucb.crimea.ua>, Niall Smart <njs3@doc.ic.ac.uk>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.ORG>, nick@foobar.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem reports closed by Poul-Henning Kamp [was: Re: misc/6712] Message-ID: <E0ydJtH-0003UD-00@oak66.doc.ic.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: Studded <Studded@san.rr.com> "Re: Problem reports closed by Poul-Henning Kamp [was: Re: misc/6712]" (May 23, 12:00pm)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 23, 12:00pm, Studded wrote: } Subject: Re: Problem reports closed by Poul-Henning Kamp [was: Re: misc/67 > Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > > Additionally, I bug people to commit things to -Stable all the time. I > even do the testing for them. My success rate is about 50%. The other > 50% often don't even bother to respond. Relying on the "nag the > committers" strategy puts an additional and unnecessary burden on the > people who've already gone out of their way to find and implement a fix. I 100% agree with you Doug, I use -stable exclusively here, and when I find a bug I usually take the time out to research it and produce a quality bug report, or if its within my means, a patch. Obviously after expending this effort I want to see it committed to -stable as well as -current, otherwise submitting bug reports is of no benefit to me. Regards, Niall To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0ydJtH-0003UD-00>